Hi!
Good thing your stoked Ken, I think I need you to pass some of that to me. Although I am slowly warming to the idea. I would very much like your help making the letter to them.
Peter
----- Original Message -----
From: "tzeentch666" <tzeentch666_at_...>
To: <netepic_at_yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2002 11:16 PM
Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] Chats with Jarvis
> --- In netepic_at_y..., "Peter Ramos" <primarch_at_c...> wrote:
> > Hi!
> >
> > He's really that negative about the previous version eh? Wierd. I
> guess all that denial clouds his judgement.
>
> * I don't think he HATED the older versions, but he has stated that
> he wished the game was more streamlined with less special rules. You
> have to admit that Adeptus Titanicus in particular got really silly
> with the level of detail for a supposed 1:285 game!
> * From his POV Epic40K is the "thinking mans" 40K game and previous
> versions were too close to the "grunt level" tabletop 40K then he
> probably wished.
> * I do absolutely agree that the old games hardly lacked strategy -
> certainly more the 40K has these days (either you are shooty or
> assault - with no real in-between).
>
>
> > I like you remain to be convinced and while I see the wisdom of
> jumping to be heard I need to hear from as many people as possible on
> this list what they think.
>
> * I'm stoked about the whole thing to tell the truth. So stoked I'm
> looking at getting a subscription to Fanatic!
> * Once we get more feedback we could work on a draft letter from the
> entire NetEpic community.
>
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
Received on Mon Feb 11 2002 - 13:17:59 UTC