Hi!
You bring up VERY good questions. I guess things are early at this point to what to do, since there remains a lot of unanswered questions. I guess we have to wait and see what Jervis does before we organize ourselves.
Peter
----- Original Message -----
From: "kume1967" <kume1967_at_...>
To: <netepic_at_yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, February 12, 2002 5:42 AM
Subject: [NetEpic ML] Epic40k Revision (How)
> Hi All,
>
> As far as I see majority of the list wants to involve as a group, and
> writing a letter to JJ that we are willing to contribute to the play
> testing. This is good but how we gonna play test? Should we made
> groups for each army that will play and report the results? How many
> of us are really willing to play and report? Or which armies they are
> willing to play and with which opponent? Or is it too early to thing
> about these?
>
> I think if we put into the letter that we have x many people and y
> armies and can give feedback weekly or biweekly will increase our
> chances to contribute, as we will be seen more professional.
>
> What do you think about this?
>
> Mete
>
>
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
Received on Tue Feb 12 2002 - 11:48:44 UTC