Re: [NetEpic ML] More brainstorming

From: dkaardal <dkaardal_at_...>
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2002 20:19:36 -0000

> >I still LOATHE the idea of giving a titan basically an immunity
> >against half of an opponants army for free.
>
> Mmmmm a walking skyscrape should be immune to any infantry, save
> exceptionally rare heroes...

walking mechanical construct. Tanks look big and indestructable
too... but one guy with a well places satchel charge can ruin it's
whole day.

if it's got moving parts, those parts can be made to not move. you're
not killing the whole titan, just trying to ruin a leg or two.

> >Hell - make them make a moral check to even CHARGE the thing! THAT
> >makes sense... it's all well and good to say that it's possible for
> >infantry to take a titan down, but I certainly woudlnt be running
> >towards one if I saw it on the battlefield.
>
> Well, no much sense...
> Tyranid and Chaos pass automatically morale test...
> Space marine have a 2+...
> Only Eldar (3+) and Ork (4+) have a chance (too low...) of being
affected
> by morale in charging Titan...

ummmm... so?

it's just one more thing that is not unbalancing, but still
illustrates the terrifying effect of a 30-40 metre tall war machine.
It's not a rule that's meant to make titans unbeatable - but it does
add one more thing to think about when assaulting one.

well, except for tyranids... ech. I hate those guys.
Received on Thu Mar 28 2002 - 20:19:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 10:59:33 UTC