Re: [NetEpic ML] 5.0 review

From: Lorenzo Canapicchi <lorenzo.canapicchi_at_...>
Date: Wed, 15 May 2002 12:08:09 +0200

Weasel Fierce wrote:
>>Absolutely not, for this reason you need to playtest your army, you can
>>balance things giving and take away, designing a game it's not simply to
>>give all the armies equal "power", epic it's _very_ different from a simple
>>wargame or Risk Play, you have pro and cons, it's a complex game.
>>
>
> Having been on this list for 5 years or so, I have kinda noticed that much
> :P

Having been on this list from the creation and knowing Peter from the old
Space marine ML I can understand this.

> Armies are supposed to be individual and different, thats the fun of the
> game, but things should still be fair to everyone.

This is a contraddiction in terms, it won't be WRH point cost to change the
things.

-- 
Lorenzo Canapicchi
TXT e-solutions S.p.A.
Via Frigia 27, 20126 Milano Italy
tel:  02.25771.460
http://www.txt.it
Received on Wed May 15 2002 - 10:08:09 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 10:59:40 UTC