Re: [NetEpic ML] [5.0]Chaos army list

From: AntiChrist <seimejote_at_...>
Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2002 07:50:12 -0000

--- In netepic_at_y..., "Peter Ramos" <primarch_at_c...> wrote:
> 1) Divide CSM from Daemon is right for me, but they should can
allies each others.
>
> >>>This one seems to be a given by now, anyone opposed to this?

Agree.

> 2) Divide Caos between powers is also good, every God with his own
> unique troops and the choose of Chaos Undivided
>
> >>>This one too seems favored, anyone opposed?

Agree.

> >>>So basically, have any greater demon of a rival that comes within
> 50cm of a rival demon must make a animosity check, lets make it
simple,
> on a 4+ the demon AND ALL ATTACHED CARDS TO THAT DEMON close the
gap and
> try to engage the rival demon and his forces. This has several
> implications:
>
> a. Simple: Instead of measuring those entire global animosity
radiuses
> in case of the 30cm radius rule, no you only keep track of greater
> demons.
>
> b. Incentive to do single power armies. The radius of 50cm is
> purposefully large. This means in small games it is virtually
impossible
> to keep rival powers apart and thus in small games in more
efficient to
> go with a single power. Also the penalty is truly staggering. To
have
> one demon and all his minions out of your control hunting another
part
> of your army is BAD news, so players can flaunt or bypass the rule
> without great risk.
>
> No doubt people will poke holes in my theories, but that's the
point!

Agree, a good compromise.

>
> Peter
Received on Thu Nov 21 2002 - 07:50:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 10:59:49 UTC