Hi!
Actually, Jar that may be a good compromise. Suggesting several ways to
divide the list and let players choose. I suspect people do this anyway
regardless if we choose one as "official" or not.
I'd like more comments on this idea before moving on to the next list.
Peter
-----Original Message-----
From: Jarreas Underwood [mailto:jarreas_at_...]
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2003 11:13 AM
To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] [5.0] Chaos revision !ends
First, the Chaos revision isn't done by any stretch of the imagination.
The 5.X file that I've posted introduces a dozen new units, half a dozen
new Chaos Rewards (including one for the Black Legion), and outlines a
new Standard / Codex army system. No one's commented on any of it and if
there are no objections I'll put it all in as optional rules / units.
The animosity rules, however, will be changed to fall in line with the
poll results.
Second, the files listed 5.1 are a personal version - they're house
rules and shouldn't really be in the Net Epic numbering system.
AntiChrist took my early rough drafts, changed some of the rules and
added loads of his own material. They're a good place to go for fluff
and AC's got some good ideas, but they should not be consitered
official.
Third, the CSM / Daemon army proposal - I'm against it. The origional
rules, fluff and (from what I can tell without being a player) the
current Chaos WH40k rules indicate that there is no such definitive
split in chaos forces. There are marines and daemons mixed in with most
of the armies I've seen / read about. This seems to be one of the major
sticking points with Chaos - they're so damn inhomogeneous that you
can't makes rules that cover all the contingencies. I have a feeling
that we'll settle for some "here are some ideas on how to form a Chaos
army - pick one" compromise.
-Yar
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
\~
|~ . o o . :;: () -0- o o .
|~ ^
/~ |
You are here. Wouldn't you rather be out there? -->
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Received on Tue Feb 25 2003 - 22:38:33 UTC