Re: [NetEpic ML] Core rules Deep Reading

From: kaptinplundar <marreola5_at_...>
Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 04:26:05 -0000

--- In netepic_at_yahoogroups.com, "Weasel Fierce" <weasel_fierce_at_h...>
wrote:
>
> >13) Building and Fortification: I like that Building can be
damaged with
> >close combat but IMHO is absurd taht infantry or cavalry can do
so!! And
> >even if I can, with a overclock of imagination, figure that
terminator can
> >destroy a buillding, you imagine a building that fall because my
beloved
> >Howling Banshee (armed with pistols and sword) cry "EEEEEEK GO
DOWN DAMN
> >BUILDING!!!"... Imho again only Knight or more could damage
building in
> >close combat.
>
> well, most infantry can be equipped with grenades, meltabombs and
similar
> explody nastiness, or simply stuff it full of mines and boobytraps.
>
> Admittedly, in 40K, some infantry units arent equipped with
grenades, for
> generalization, Im quite content with allowing all infantry to
blow
> buildings.
> Cavalry and bikes however, shouldnt be capable of knocking out
structures
> like that, It just seems wrong!
>
>
> weasel
>
>
>


What about those Chaos Juggers? or Ork (Cyboarz?)? I can imagine a
herd of these taking out support structures in a charge.

Size and type of the building should determine its collapseability.

KaptinPlundar
Received on Fri Mar 21 2003 - 04:26:05 UTC