RE: [NetEpic ML] Re: [5.0] Slann and Necron Issues.

From: Jarreas Underwood <jarreas_at_...>
Date: Wed, 29 Oct 2003 08:52:57 -0500 (EST)

I'm a little unclear about how the NetEpic Slaan/Necrons relate to the GW Necrons - is the background the same, did you come up with the Necrons before GW? 40k Necrons are some mongo bad guys all on their own, while here they're relegated to a support/slave race role. Which part do we want them to play? It's not really sufficient to say they're a stand-alone army, as that makes the assumption that they're subservient to the Slaan.

Personally, my opinion is to leave 'em lower in the heirarchy - it makes sense that *someone* created a machine race. V'ger aside, machine races don't evolve.
-Yar



=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
\~
 |~ . o o . :;: () -0- o o .
 |~ ^
/~ |
         You are here. Wouldn't you rather be out there? -->
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Received on Wed Oct 29 2003 - 13:52:57 UTC