Re: [NetEpic ML] Re: Chaos issues

From: Jarreas Underwood <jarreas_at_...>
Date: Thu, 7 Apr 2005 15:25:49 -0400 (EDT)

>Point taken. I beleive Jar has included them in this manner and has
>taken animosity to an optional section.

Actually, I didn't - the current Chaos rules only have -1 card per extra power. The point of laughing at this restriction in 6k+ battles is quite valid. This is why I favored animosity - in large battles with more Greater Daemons it'd come much more into play than at the 3k level (where the card loss would hurt more). I figured the two together would balance Chaos - one at low levels and the other at high.

I'd like to put animosity bak in as a core rule, but we'd probably be better off with it as an optional rule and seeing how it goes.
-Yar




=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
\~
 |~ . o o . :;: () -0- o o .
 |~ ^
/~ |
         You are here. Wouldn't you rather be out there? -->
=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
Received on Thu Apr 07 2005 - 19:25:49 UTC