Re: [NetEpic ML] Eldar Exarch Requirements

From: Peter Ramos <primarch_at_...>
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2005 18:31:33 -0400

Hi!

I beleive you have proposed the most "optimal" solution. :-)

Peter

cibernyam wrote:

>Hi,
>
>Well, the funny thing is that I've played always with the 2nd ed army cards
>with v4 (I just changed the costs and VPwhere needed), and of course,
>followed the rule on the card. I never thought it wasn't specified in the
>rules. Maybe the fact that I don't own an Eldar army and I just played some
>games using them may have sthing to do with it. I read the first draft of
>eldar v5 but since then I didn't have the chance to read it in deep, just
>separate parts. But for one thing I'm sure is that my Eldar opponents have
>always used this rule.
>
>I say, keep the rule in the eldar army book as optional, stating that this
>rule was actually core in the past (before NetEpic) and as a side/foot note
>the reason (GW had the brilliant idea of writing the rule on the card and
>not in the rulebook, which has this name 'rule'-'book' for some weird reason
>beyond GW comprehension, and, well, we just forgot...)*. It may seem a bit
>useless but may prevent more than one really useless discussion. Specially
>if you keep using the old 2nd ed. Army cards. In the end, the players will
>decide.
>
>Albert
>
>* Let the reason be ("we just forgot, it wasn't in the 2nd ed book but on a
>2nd ed army card, use your judgement to decide its application, as
>always" ), it *may* be better
>
>
Received on Mon Apr 11 2005 - 22:31:33 UTC