Re: [NetEpic ML] Slann necron

From: Peter Ramos <primarch_at_...>
Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2006 19:26:44 -0400

Kelvin Henderson wrote:

>>Time to weigh in, I guess. ;-)
>>
>>For me the actual name was less of an issue than the other point I
>>brought up, which has not provoked much comment.
>>
>>That was regarding the point of necron vehicles being skimmers instead
>>of tracked vehicles.
>>
>>What the take on this?
>>
>>
>
>Sounds perfectly fine to me. Should there be a slight point adjustment to
>take into account the advantage of doing pop-up attacks?
>
>-Kelvin....
>"Everyone's always in favour of saving Hitler's brain. But when you put it
>in the body of a great white shark, ooohh! Suddenly you've gone too far!"
>-Professor Hubert J. Farnsworth
>
>
Hi!

I'd keep the cost as is (which were high to begin with) and try them
like that until further data says they must be higher.

Peter
Received on Tue Jan 31 2006 - 23:26:44 UTC