Re: [NetEpic ML] Re: Necrons for NetEpic

From: Peter Ramos <netepic_at_...>
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 22:01:22 -0400

Hi!

I'm open to name suggestions. Slanndroids is just one example, the only
one I cdould think of.

I open the floor to name suggestions.

As far as a stand alone Necron book according to GW fluff, it would be
an optional army until extensive playtesting is done, unlike other books
that are core.

Peter

Bruce Scott wrote:
>
> I'm kinda in 2 minds here. I think what is in the Slann book and GW
> cannon have diverged a lot, so I support the call for a proper Necron
> list. Particularly in light of the fact that the Necrons supposedly
> killed off the "old ones" :-). However, if we are doing a "proper"
> Necron list I'd like to see it based on the actual 40K Necrons rather
> than the E:A list.
>
> I think stand-alone, the NetEpic Necrons look to be about the most
> unbalanced force in the whole range. They get a bunch of specials
> for every single stand and appear to have paid 0 points for them, and
> their regen should be 6+ or at very best 5+ IMO. Personally, I'd be
> quite happy if they were removed from the Slann book entirely. I
> think this would leave it pretty nicely balanced, though you'd
> probably have to give the Slann aircraft or effective AA. Obviously
> people who have built a NetEpic Necron force probably wouldn't agree
> here. A name change might be an appropriate measure....but please
> not Slanndroids....the pun is terrible. Call em T2s, Bugspray, Late
> for Dinner....but not Slanndroids.
>
> :-)
>
> --- In netepic_at_yahoogroups.com <mailto:netepic%40yahoogroups.com>,
> Peter Ramos <netepic_at_...> wrote:
> >
> > Hi!
> >
> > Like I said before, it is perhaps high time to just make a name
> change
> > for slann necrons and make a list for the "regular" necrons.
> >
> > Opinions?
> >
> > Peter
> >
> >
> > Gary wrote:
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
Received on Wed Mar 07 2007 - 02:01:22 UTC