[NetEpic ML] Re: Flyers revisited yet again!

From: <warprat_at_...>
Date: Thu, 30 Mar 2000 14:13:22 -0800

Hi Peter!

I like the idea of listing several alternatives, so further playtesting
can
be done. Flyers are SO powerfull, they deserve a lot of thought.


Warprat ;)



"peter ramos" <pramos-_at_...> wrote:
original article:http://www.egroups.com/group/netepic/?start=3141
> Hi!
>
> As I prepare for editing I'm revising the long list of e-mails
generated.
> Flyer rules still seem like an unresolved issue, or partially solved.
The
> series of e-mails by Nils are of particular interest to me since most
of his
> suggestions and ideas I like and plus he seems to have tested some of
them.
>
> Many have expressed that they dont use them or are optional. I have a
> serious inclination into making all flyer rules optional and list the
whole
> host of them so as to let gamers pick what they want. It seems to me
thats
> what people do anyway and no rules set for flyers is universally
accepted.
>
> Another idea is to LIST several flyer rules alternatives in an
appendix in
> the core rules. This also may be another way to do it.
>
> I'd like opinions in this regard.
>
> Peter
>
Received on Thu Mar 30 2000 - 22:13:22 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 10:58:55 UTC