RE: [NetEpic ML] Remaining armies Squats

From: <nils.saugen_at_...>
Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2000 16:02:25 +0200

Hi,

We have just treated it as a missprint and given +1 to the warriors an 0 to
the thunderers.

Nils

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Ramos [SMTP:pramos2_at_...]
> Sent: 12. april 2000 15:50
> To: netepic_at_egroups.com
> Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] Remaining armies Squats
>
> Hi!
>
> Good points! I just wanted to round them off, but you're prices are good.
>
> Regarding the thunderers and such, I have wondered that myself and can't
> come up with a good explanation.
>
> What do other people think?
>
> Peter
>
>
> It's good to see that people agree with me, but I think 200 and 500
> is a bit expencive.
>
> Compared to the IG bombard-battery, with a constant BP of 9, it
> costs 200, the Goliath can get 9 if the player rolls good.
>
> If we compare the Artillery Company with the Goliath Company, the IG
> gets a total of 33 BPs, while the Squats can get 30 if they are extremly
> lucky.
>
> I think that 175 & 475 are fair prices.
>
> An other thing that puzels me are the squat infantry. Why does the
> thunderers have +1 CAF while the warriors has 0. Shouldn't it bethe other
> way around?
>
> Eivind
>
>
>
> _____
>
> <http://click.egroups.com/1/2991/3/_/7255/_/955547474/>
>
> <http://adimg.egroups.com/img/2991/3/_/7255/_/955547474/FlowerStamp1.gif>
> _____
>
Received on Wed Apr 12 2000 - 14:02:25 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 10:58:57 UTC