Re: [NetEpic ML] Re: Sisters of Battle & the other Imperial lists.

From: Peter Ramos <pramos2_at_...>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2000 09:11:14 -0500

Hi!

hehe, true. Then if we keep them as separate armies each list should have as
much feasable support as needed to make them a viable army.

Peter

-----Original Message-----
From: Luca Lettieri <magnus_at_...>
To: netepic_at_egroups.com <netepic_at_egroups.com>
Date: Wednesday, May 24, 2000 9:09 AM
Subject: [NetEpic ML] Re: Sisters of Battle & the other Imperial lists.


>> I view the IG and space marine as two TRUE distinct parts with
>> their own character.
>
>This is true, but it does not solve the real problem - which is, any
>commander worth of his title would use the "combined army approach"
>every day of the week. It just makes sense, after all.
>
>Of course, we all know this would lead to cheesed-out armies. This is
>not all that bad, actually. It's only proper that any heretic foolish
>enough to challenge the almighty Empire of Humankind feels THE WRATH
>OF THE EMPEROR'S ARMIES AND DIES, DIES, DIES!!!!
>MWUAHAHAHAHAHAHAAAAAA!!!
>
>Ahem...
>
>But seriously, the empire does not rule the majority of the galaxy by
>chance.
>
>
>Luca Lettieri
>
>
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>It's amazing what can happen when people connect.
>Start an email group at
>http://click.egroups.com/1/3948/5/_/7255/_/959177360/
>------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
>
Received on Wed May 24 2000 - 14:11:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 10:59:00 UTC