I believe that we should reserve the T hawk for the Space marines!
The may by 10 Rhinos for a 150 points, thats transportation enough!
Nils
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Ramos [SMTP:pramos2_at_...]
> Sent: 24. mai 2000 16:51
> To: netepic_at_egroups.com
> Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] Suggestions please.
>
> Hi!
>
> The razorbacks would be a good addition I think as well. Do they need
> transport ships? Perhaps using the T-hawk? or let them walk?
>
> Peter
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nils.saugen_at_... <nils.saugen@...>
> To: netepic_at_egroups.com <netepic_at_egroups.com>
> Date: Wednesday, May 24, 2000 9:42 AM
> Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] Suggestions please.
>
>
> >Well perhaps razorbacks? I would change the Immolator to the double flame
> >attack though! I think that will make it a much more interesting weapon.
> >
> >They seem to lack a really good Close assault unit, perhaps we could up
> the
> >caf of the archangels. They are somewhat limted in numbers already,
> perhaps
> >to +4 or +5? Other than that I think it would be nice to playtest them a
> >couple of tims to see how they work, and then make any neccesary
> >adjustments!
> >
> >Nils
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: Peter Ramos [SMTP:pramos2_at_...]
> >> Sent: 24. mai 2000 16:30
> >> To: netepic_at_egroups.com
> >> Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] Suggestions please.
> >>
> >> Hi!
> >>
> >> Sounds perfectly reasonable. So now we need to add anything to round
> off
> >> their list. The predator is a must, what else is needed?
> >>
> >> Peter
> >>
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: nils.saugen_at_... <nils.saugen@...>
> >> To: netepic_at_egroups.com <netepic_at_egroups.com>
> >> Date: Wednesday, May 24, 2000 9:28 AM
> >> Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] Suggestions please.
> >>
> >>
> >> >I wote to keep it a stand alone army! For me it just doesn't feel
> right
> >> to
> >> >make them part of the spacemarine army.
> >> >
> >> >They are the armed part of the imperial church, fighting aganist
> >> disbelivers
> >> >and heretics wherever they can be found. Most often the Sisters will
> be
> >> the
> >> >first line of defence on any planet attaced by the enemies of mankind.
> >> >Fighting alongside local militia forces, defending the local shrines!
> All
> >> >this makes me feel that the sisters as an army is more closely linked
> to
> >> IG
> >> >than SM!
> >> >
> >> >Nils
> >> >
> >> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> >> From: Peter Ramos [SMTP:pramos2_at_...]
> >> >> Sent: 24. mai 2000 16:06
> >> >> To: netepic_at_egroups.com
> >> >> Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] Suggestions please.
> >> >>
> >> >> Hi!
> >> >>
> >> >> I'd add the predators for sure, they seem to have that right "feel"
> for
> >> >> them. As for what extra things, I think we should decide first
> wether
> >> it
> >> >> will be a stand alone army or a part of marines. This will determine
> >> what
> >> >> we
> >> >> can create.
> >> >>
> >> >> Peter
> >> >>
> >> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> >> From: jyrki.saari_at_... <jyrki.saari@...>
> >> >> To: netepic_at_egroups.com <netepic_at_egroups.com>
> >> >> Date: Wednesday, May 24, 2000 8:39 AM
> >> >> Subject: [NetEpic ML] Suggestions please.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> >I think that for the moment I have rached the limits of my
> imagination
> >> >> >considering the Sisters of Battle so I ask for some suggestions. My
> >> >> purpose
> >> >> >was to create a fast-strike cityfighting army to defend the
> Imperial
> >> >> Shrines
> >> >> >with the emphasis in close range firepower and occassional long
> range
> >> >> >support. The question is: what should be added next.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >My opinion is that the Sisters are somewhere in between of the IG
> and
> >> SM:
> >> >> >lighter than IG but more heavy than a pure planetary assault force
> >> (SM).
> >> >> The
> >> >> >predator would probably be a reasonable addition.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Suggestions?
> >> >> >
> >> >> >Jyrki Saari
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >>
> >------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >> >Missing old school friends? Find them here:
> >> >> >http://click.egroups.com/1/4055/5/_/7255/_/959175589/
> >> >>
> >>
> >------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >> Failed tests, classes skipped, forgotten locker combinations.
> >> >> Remember the good 'ol days
> >> >> http://click.egroups.com/1/4053/5/_/7255/_/959177324/
> >> >>
> >>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >>
> >> >
> >>
> >------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >Best friends, most artistic, class clown Find 'em here:
> >> >http://click.egroups.com/1/4054/5/_/7255/_/959178530/
> >>
> >------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> >
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> Did you know you're using eGroups now?
> >> Start a free email group today at
> >> http://click.egroups.com/1/3947/5/_/7255/_/959178821/
> >>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >
> >------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >Old school buds here:
> >http://click.egroups.com/1/4057/5/_/7255/_/959179352/
> >------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Did you know you're using eGroups now?
> Start a free email group today at
> http://click.egroups.com/1/3947/5/_/7255/_/959180387/
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
Received on Wed May 24 2000 - 15:08:41 UTC