Re: [NetEpic ML] IG/TG/SoB and all things Imperial

From: Joshua W Raup <deaconblue3_at_...>
Date: Thu, 25 May 2000 03:21:50 -0400

No. I like the idea of keeping the TG as a seperate list. It give the
Imperial forces a bit of variety that they need.


-Kelvin....

-->The variety is there, and it only takes up two army lists to do it.
One for SM's and one for IG. There should be a small bit of cross-over
between those two, but that's it. With a seprate TG list, and the "no
allies" rule, there exists too much rules bending, because of Titans and
praetorians. The no allies rule is anything but a firm one, whether you
play with it or not. It's a flummox to play mix and match with certain
units, denying them to one list, while making it perfectly fine for
another, yet having some (ie Titans), available to all. Some of it just
doesn't work out logically, from a game mechanics view, and viewed
through the back story. I dunno..this has been bugging me for awhile.
can you tell?

Josh R
Minister for General Mayhem
"Don't let the bastards grind you down." Gen. Joseph Stilwell
Received on Thu May 25 2000 - 07:21:50 UTC