I haven't seen this rules. Would you mind re-posting them,please?
>From: nils.saugen_at_...
>Reply-To: netepic_at_egroups.com
>To: netepic_at_egroups.com
>Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] Veteran HQs
>Date: Fri, 11 Aug 2000 11:05:54 +0200
>
>Hi,
>
>I agree, +5 for the SM veteran HQ should be more than enough.
>
>As for veteran IG, I think it would be best to limit those to support cards
>only. The casuality rate of the IG is so high that it's unlikely to have
>whole companies of veterans. A while back I posted some rule suggestions
>for
>different types of IG (Tallarn, Cadian, Mordian, etc.), perhaps we could
>use
>those(or something similar) as veteran IG support units?
>
>Nils
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Albert Farr� Benet [SMTP:cibernyam_at_...]
> > Sent: 11. august 2000 12:27
> > To: netepic_at_egroups.com
> > Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] Veteran HQs
> >
> > >Does it strike anyone else as kinda wierd that Space marine veteran
> > >companies have the same HQ units as everyone else? I'd think that a
> > >veteran unit would be pretty likely to have a veteran HQ.
> >
> > >My suggestion would be to have a Veteran HQ unit with the same stats
> > >as a regular HQ, but w/ one of the 2 special abbilities of the SM
> > >Commander (ie forced march or tactical genius) to be chosen before
> > >the beginning of the game. Thoughts? Would this make the SMs too
> > >powerful?
> >
> > Yip. I would use it the same way as Terminator HQ. +1 to Veteran CAF for
>a
> >
> > total of +5. No more.
> >
> > >And on a side note, why aren't there any special veteran units for
> > >the IG? In W40K (small-scale) there's an entire regiment (calan or
> > >something... called the "deathworld") that's considered veterans... I
> > >wouldn't think that the Imps would have that much difficulty fielding
> > >a company or 2 of veterans (and I'd also support the veteran HQ for
> > >them too)...
> >
> > For a company of veterans I would use tactical/assault/heavy stands with
> > an
> > extra +1 to CAF and morale rating 3+. If you find this too less you can
> > think of any way to improve them (What about no chain of command or some
> > advantages about it?)
> >
> > ________________________________________________________________________
> > Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at
http://www.hotmail.com
Received on Sun Aug 13 2000 - 13:15:55 UTC