Salut,
Tu as �crit :
> > 3. I know we've gone over the "stagnant" nature of
> the Imperium
> > before. Me and Lucca disagree on this, and most likely
> forever will.
> > There really isn't enough information to really make a case
> either way on
> > this one. What we do have is limited to military technology, and we
> > don't know much about other aspects, such as medicine, commercial
> > technology, or even space technology. We only have what
> gets seen on the
> > battlefield. I tend towards saying that the Imperium is not in fact
> > stagnant, just slow in universe shattering developments.
This point is not very clear in every version of the background... I think
we could say that the Imperium is stagnant. Even a slow development could be
assimilated to a stagnant situation as the imperial ressources are huge!
Significant discoveries only come from the STCs. In addition we all kwow
that medicine and commercial technologies have often a link with military
technologies so if the military technology is stagnant the other
technologies are also stagnants...
Fran�ois Bruntz
---------------
The La�tus Prime Tribune
Epic 40k, NetEpic, Space Marine/Titan Legion, Epic Escarmouches
http://www.geocities.com/fbruntz
Received on Thu Aug 17 2000 - 07:33:56 UTC