Re: [NetEpic ML] Imperator troops, save vs Squat rad bomb

From: Peter Ramos <primarch_at_...>
Date: Tue, 12 Sep 2000 14:37:19 -0400

Hi!

We did Weasel, but it was voted down to keep as is.

Peter

----- Original Message -----
From: "Weasel Fierce" <septimus__at_...>
To: <netepic_at_egroups.com>
Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2000 1:47 AM
Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] Imperator troops, save vs Squat rad bomb


>
>
>
> >
> >HI
> >
> >
> >If a Imperotor Titan with no shields and full company of troopers, is hit
> >by
> >a squat rad bomb, dont the take a hit from the rad bomb ?
> >
>
> Not unless the rules for the rad bomb states that it affects infantry in
> transports.
> Under the normal NetEpic rules, infantry are safe as long as the vehicle
> doesnt blow.
>
> BTW: Didnt we discuss an alternative to the current rules for infantry and
> tank movement when troops disembark / embark???
>
> i know I proposed a system somewhat like E40K (i.e. infantry pays 5 cm. of
> their move to embark / disembark, the vehicle pays 5 cm. every time troops
> embark / disembark regardless of the number of stands doing it at once)
>
> Was this forgotten or just not interesting enough to make it into the
rules
> to replace the cumbersome and irritating transport rules now???
> _________________________________________________________________________
> Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
>
> Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
> http://profiles.msn.com.
>
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
Received on Tue Sep 12 2000 - 18:37:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 10:59:07 UTC