Re: [NetEpic ML] Re: Core rule interpretations

From: peter ramos <ramospeter_at_...>
Date: Wed, 18 Oct 2000 09:48:17 EDT

Hi!

It seems more people on the list agree than disagree with this, perhaps its
worth including in the core rules?

Anyone against this?

Peter


>From: "dardman" <dardman_at_...>
>Reply-To: netepic_at_egroups.com
>To: <netepic_at_egroups.com>
>Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] Re: Core rule interpretations
>Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2000 10:43:03 -0400
>
>Multiple combats should be paired off and any extra moving to double and
>triple up. Why would we gang up on one unit and leave the other 3 alone?Of
>course if it was a leader but this would fall into the category of
>targeting
>commands. I believe in the way our group plays that if 7 attackers charge 3
>units that each defender has 2 attackers and one unit has a 3rd. I often
>send my rhinos into sucide missions to slow the enemy with my squats.
>Darius
>
>
>____________NetZero Free Internet Access and Email_________
>Download Now http://www.netzero.net/download/index.html
>Request a CDROM 1-800-333-3633
>___________________________________________________________

_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.

Share information about yourself, create your own public profile at
http://profiles.msn.com.
Received on Wed Oct 18 2000 - 13:48:17 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 10:59:09 UTC