Re: [NetEpic ML] Return of the slann

From: Eivind Borgeteien <eivind.borgeteien_at_...>
Date: Fri, 9 Feb 2001 12:00:04 +0100

Its OK by me that planes regenerate before them crashhes to the ground, but
I think its wrong that a plane should have the same chances of succeding the
regeneration as the ground forces. They have less time to conduct the
repairs, and this should be reflected in the rules.

Eivind
----- Original Message -----
From: <jyrki.saari_at_...>
To: <netepic_at_yahoogroups.com>
Sent: Friday, February 09, 2001 8:48 AM
Subject: RE: [NetEpic ML] Return of the slann


> [snip]
> > I have trouble with flyers regenerating for the following reason:
> > They are shot down and crash to the ground, anyone seen
> > pictures of plane
> > crashes???? Parts are spread throughout a very wide area!!!!
>
> Yes, but assume the plane regenerates before it hits the ground. I imagine
> the case being that the hit caused just a "near kill", and the repair
> systems kicked in at the last possible moment.
>
> > Furtermore this
> > would indicate that all Slann aricraft are VTOL crafts. Thats
> > ok I guess,
> > but you vould have to device rules on where the planes should
> > land!!!!
> >
>
> Why? Even though it is possible I have hard time imagining why the pilot
of
> a fighter/bomber would like to land in the middle of a battlefield.
>
> >
>
>
> Jyrki Saari
>
> -There is no such thing as free lunch because eating takes time and time
is
> money.
>
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
Received on Fri Feb 09 2001 - 11:00:04 UTC