Battlefleet Gothic also has a campaign system. It is pretty simple, but by
no means bad. I actually had some ideas as how to modify it for NetEpic but
unfortunately Ididn't write them down ad forgot what they were :(
My suggestion is to look what some existing systems have, take the best
ideas and combine them, and then make the rest up.
Jyrki Saari
-There is no such thing as free lunch because eating takes time and time is
money.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ext Alberto Lagi [mailto:alagi_at_...]
> Sent: 22. March 2001 11:01
> To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] Campaign System
>
>
> > some of the old Jourrnals (10 and 11 or so) had a mapbased
> campaign system
> > for Space marine 2 and 40K2....called Mega-wars or so.
> >
> > Ill see if I can find my old worn issues
> >
> > Anyone else remember this?
>
> I have both parts. It didn't include a resource system, the
> scale was to small
> but I think they were good. I remember that were included
> some nice things like
> scouting enemy armies.
>
> The only need was to write a feasible reason for the armies
> to spread out on
> the territory and fight several engagements rather that just
> stay all together.
> But this is a thing which most campaign rules lack,
> especially that are without
> production.
>
> I have another draft of campaign rules which has an
> interesting tackle on this.
>
> If you cannot find your Journals I will look for them. So in
> the meanwhile I
> can concentrate on other rules.
>
> Alberto
>
>
> ------------------------ Yahoo! Groups Sponsor
> ---------------------~-~>
> Make good on the promise you made at graduation to keep
> in touch. Classmates.com has over 14 million registered
> high school alumni--chances are you'll find your friends!
> http://us.click.yahoo.com/03IJGA/DMUCAA/4ihDAA/JfNVlB/TM
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> -------_->
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
> http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
Received on Thu Mar 22 2001 - 09:08:13 UTC