RE: [NetEpic ML] Implications of "epic" proportions

From: <jyrki.saari_at_...>
Date: Fri, 6 Apr 2001 12:42:28 +0300

> -----Original Message-----
> From: ext Weasel Fierce [mailto:septimus__at_hotmail.com]
> Sent: 05. April 2001 10:39
> To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] Implications of "epic" proportions
>
>
>
>
> >But GW just doesn't seem to understand that you can do that
> to a game and
> >it will still make the cash you want. they seem to think
> that the only way
> >to keep a game alive is to COMPLETELY re-write it every 4
> years along with
> >all the forces available for it, making my old force obsolete.
>
> Actually, the mainstay of many 40K3 armies are still 40K2
> armies...and in
> the case of 40K the rewrite was nescesary and for the the better.
>

Necessary? yes. For the better? beg to differ on that one. They fell intoto
the same trap they did with E40K: over generalization.

> However, with stuff like the "new" space hulk or the dreaded
> necromunda-gorkamorka it is not requried and merely stupidity.
>
> As with the last edition of warhammer which was released as a
> brand new
> game, but the revisions were out in white dwarf as
> well....totalling 2
> pages.
>
> What a new edition. BUt people liked it, as it was their old
> warhammer with
> some bugs clarified.
>

Really? That's the first time GW has done it. Are you sure that not even a
single army was drastically altered to require you spend some more
$$/��/whatever?


> I still want to see what players think of the new warhammer
>
> >
> >-Kelvin...
> >
> >"Look, just give me some inner peace
> >or I'll mop the floor with you."
> >-Homer
> >
>


Jyrki Saari

-There is no such thing as free lunch because eating takes time and time is
money.
Received on Fri Apr 06 2001 - 09:42:28 UTC