RE: [NetEpic ML] Advanced NetEpic (was: Ramblings)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: ext Imam Sawez [mailto:parrot1500_at_...]
> Sent: 28. May 2001 3:28
> To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
> Subject: [NetEpic ML] Advanced NetEpic (was: Ramblings)
>
>
> Oh, man, an updated version of NEtepic would be fine
> and dandy! The rules would need tewaking, but the big
> change would be the army lists....we could make the
> Eldar, IG, Orks, etc. come more in line with the
> current version of WH40K! Like....Armageddon Steel
> Legions! And Eldar using the Wave Serpent and not the
> Falcon as their primary APC! And Ork Trukkboyz! Why,
> this could be the best thing ever!
>
> Actually, while it would be cool to to have an update,
> we must also be aware that the current version of
> NetEpic is fine and dandy. To add an alternate army
> list which is more in line with the current version of
> 40K would be a worhty endeavor, but one that must be
> approached seriously and cautiously, unless we end up
> liek a certain british game company that re-releases
> everything seemingly on a whim.
>
> Who's with me?
>
>
Actually I think I am. Somebody mentioned there already being "advanced Net
Epic", namely the Heresy, and the more I think about it the more I agree.
Heresy seems to be truly excellent game ("seems", because I haven't had a
chance to verify my first impression about it yet). The Net Epic system can
only take so much tweaking without becoming overburdened, and I think we
have just about reached that limit. I'd gladly participate in making new
army lists (surprise!) although I must say that most likely I wouldn't use
any of them. I like my IG assault troops, Vindicators, Predators, Bikes and
Whirlwinds way too much.
Jyrki Saari
-There is no such thing as free lunch because eating takes time and time is
money.
Received on Mon May 28 2001 - 06:31:51 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: Tue Oct 22 2019 - 10:59:22 UTC