Re: [NetEpic ML] Advanced NetEpic (was: Ramblings)

From: Peter Ramos <primarch_at_...>
Date: Mon, 28 May 2001 10:46:35 -0400

Hi!

We have at different times discussed adding this or that to the rules,
its only natural, after you play a game for a long time you wonder what
more it will take. We have realized however that the mechanics of net
epic can only take so much and certain things just dont fit well. Its
funny how other members have pointed out what even I am slow to realize,
advance net epic IS Heresy.

The reasons for doing Heresy are the same ones that crop up here all the
time, things like I want "x" in net epic, but it doesn't work. Kenneth
and I made Heresy with all those points in mind, we wanted a lot and
made mechanics to a fit it. I'd urge members to look up the Heresy rules
and give your input, it may answer what many have been looking for.

I'm all for making newer (optional) army list, everyone likes more units!

Peter

> Actually I think I am. Somebody mentioned there already being "advanced Net
> Epic", namely the Heresy, and the more I think about it the more I agree.
> Heresy seems to be truly excellent game ("seems", because I haven't had a
> chance to verify my first impression about it yet). The Net Epic system can
> only take so much tweaking without becoming overburdened, and I think we
> have just about reached that limit. I'd gladly participate in making new
> army lists (surprise!) although I must say that most likely I wouldn't use
> any of them. I like my IG assault troops, Vindicators, Predators, Bikes and
> Whirlwinds way too much.
>
> Jyrki Saari
>
> -There is no such thing as free lunch because eating takes time and time is
> money.
>
> To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
>
> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>
>
Received on Mon May 28 2001 - 14:46:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 10:59:22 UTC