Re: [Epic] Eldar Knights

From: Alan E & Carmel J Brain <aebrain_at_...>
Date: Fri, 03 Oct 1997 13:51:31 -0700

Stephen Sheldon wrote:

> I feel left out on this one. I think the knights should all have 5+
> armour and a save for simplicity sakes.

Save, yes. Armour 5+ - generally, maybe 6+ for the towering Destroyers.

> The Bright stallion, maybe 30-35
> move, a 45cm pulse laser like the one on the revenants, and 2 assault.

> Fire gales I think 25 move 4fp at 45cm, and 2 assault,

> and the towering
> destroyers, 2fp _at_30cm 25cm move and 6AF.

The only source I have is secondary: ie
http://w3.rz.fhtw-berlin.de/%7Es0155648/epic_eldar_knights.html

But I don't have WD 126 which has the original rules for same, according
to the WD index at
http://rfhs8012.fh-regensburg.de/~rotter/WWW/WH40K/Dwarf/wd_index.html

Interesting that both sources are in Deutschland.

Anyone got WD 126? Would they be willing to extract the details and put
them on the list?
-- 
aebrain_at_...     <> <>    How doth the little Crocodile
| Alan & Carmel Brain|      xxxxx       Improve his shining tail?
| Canberra Australia |  xxxxxHxHxxxxxx _MMMMMMMMM_MMMMMMMMM
 abrain_at_...  o OO*O^^^^O*OO o oo     oo oo     oo  
                    By pulling MAERKLIN Wagons, in 1/220 Scale
Received on Fri Oct 03 1997 - 20:51:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 13:09:55 UTC