Re: [Epic] Modified Infantry Comparsion

From: Scott Shupe <shupes_at_...>
Date: Thu, 04 Dec 1997 19:25:19 -0500

Erik K. Rutins wrote:
>
> > The Imperium is capable of churning out the armor, true, but
> > people are even cheaper (and there's certainly no shortage of warm
>
> I understand what you're saying, Scott, but I just can't think of the
> majority of an army being infantry-only. I mean detachment-wise. It
> only took about 15 years after the invention of the tank for leading
> edge tactics to realize that both infantry and tanks were more powerful
> when used together. I know this is old news to everyone, but maybe
> that's what the army list is intended to reflect?

        Fine, as long as they're consistant about it. What bugs me
is that none of the other armies' infantry detachments are similarly
penalized.

Scott Shupe
shupes_at_... shupes@... http://www.rpi.edu/~shupes
***********************************************************************
"Omigod! The dead have risen and they're voting Republican!" - the
Simpsons
Received on Fri Dec 05 1997 - 00:25:19 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 13:10:05 UTC