Re: [Epic] Necrons

From: Michael & Catherine Goh <cmgoh_at_...>
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 1998 08:40:44 +0800

At 10:34 29/01/98 +0930, you wrote:

>There are good, working, functional army list for Squats under Epic 40K
>available now. Just because some of us don't work for GW doesn't mean we
>havn't been around as long (or even longer) than some of their games
>designers and arn't capable of coming up with working rules. They only need
>to be accepted by your regular opponents to be official within your games.
>Who cares wether GW stamps them as official or not, it doesn't make the
>rules any better nessisarily or the games any more enjoyable. Check out
>Chris Pinson's web page Liber Imperialis, it now has a Squat subpage called
>Warlords devoted to the stumpy ones in Epic 40K with a set of armylists
>taken from Citadel Journel and then adapted through play testing and through
>general concensus on this list. They work as is shown by the narrative on
>the site for the Liberation of Karak Dur, a campaign that Chris and I are
>fighting between Squats and Imperial forces which has already had 2 major
>3000pt battles and 2 of our "minibattles" (see webpage or Dropship Issue
>1.). Incedently for those following the campaign, I won the second
>minibattle (reinforcments) and now go into tomorrows 3000 pt dawn assualt
>with an extra 250pts of defenders.
>Cheers
>Alun
>

I think that my wife (Catherine) just feels ignored. Anyway we've already
got the citadel journal one and I've just printed off the above web page so
I'll take it to her and see if she wants to play yet.

Mike
Received on Thu Jan 29 1998 - 00:40:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 13:10:15 UTC