Re: [Epic] War Engine BM suggestion

From: Scott Shupe <shupes_at_...>
Date: Fri, 06 Feb 1998 08:10:24 -0500

Carl Billen wrote:
>
> How's this for a stupid, but simple rule:
>
> Each War Engine has a 'Blast Marker Ignorance' number, which equals its
> points value divided by 100, rounded up. This results in the following
> values:
>
> Warhound : 2
> Reaver : 4
> Warlord : 6
> Adeptus Titanicus Ordinatus : 2
> Imperator : 9
> Leviathan : 4
> Shadowsword/Baneblade : 2
> Ork Battle Fortress : 1
> Gargant : 3
> Great Gargant : 5
> Meag Gargant : 7
> Revenants : 2
> Phantoms : 4
> Cobra/Scorpion : 2
> Subjugator : 2
> Questor : 2
> Plague Tower : 2
> Lord of Battles : 3
> Hierodule : 4
> Hierophant : 5
> Dominatrix : 5
>
> When a War Engine wants to fire, the BMs on it are counted and the 'BM
> Ignorance Number' is subtracted. The result (if it is positive) is treated
> with the normal BM rules; if it is negative, the WE can fire without
> problems.

        Good one. But why base it off of point values? Or rather,
what kind of numbers do you get if you base it off of DC instead (so
that a WE's ability to ignore BMs is related to its size & toughness)?
Perhaps DC/2, or two-thirds of DC, or something like that (don't have
my books handy). Could go a long way to making the Tyranid titans
look worthwhile.

Scott Shupe
shupes_at_... shupes@... http://www.rpi.edu/~shupes
***********************************************************************
"Omigod! The dead have risen and they're voting Republican!" - the
Simpsons
Received on Fri Feb 06 1998 - 13:10:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 13:10:16 UTC