Re: [Epic] intro and aspect warroiors

From: Colen McAlister <brother_morgan_at_...>
Date: Sun, 3 May 1998 15:07:13 +0100

In article <199805022019.NAA28676_at_...>, tzeench
<tzeench_at_...> writes

>> >dark reaper 15 15(45) 2 2(1) 4+ HW 19
>> Why the altered AS?
>
>Because dark reapers suck in close combat. I think all aspect warriors
>should have only two assult as they are barely better than gaurdians. The
>only exception would be the close combat aspect warriors (banshees and
>scorpions).

Fair enough. I don't have the Eldar Dex, so I can't really remember
their statline.

>> >dire avenger 15 15 2 2 4+ none 10
>> Give them FP3, and an extra point or three on the cost.
>
>I think 2FP fits them as they are exactly the same as guardians with
>shuikan catapults but slightly tougher
<frown>
Wasn't there some special rule in Epic2nd about Dire Avengers? If you
got a hit, you got an extra attack, or some such?

-- 
Colen 'Not Colin' McAlister, wargamer extrordinaire     X
 http://www.geocities.com/TimesSquare/Arena/4368/    OOOX===========>
 brother_morgan_at_..., UIN 2149443 ('Morgan')   X
"Don't question authority; it doesn't know either." - Yet More Philosophy
Received on Sun May 03 1998 - 14:07:13 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 13:10:36 UTC