Re: [Epic] Assumptions on the next edition

From: Geoff Kemp <geoffkemp_at_...>
Date: Sun, 28 Jun 1998 22:02:31 +0100

When I originaillly worte the post I was refering to 40K

----------
> From: John Brisson <brisson_at_...>
> To: space-marine_at_...
> Subject: Re: [Epic] Assumptions on the next edition
> Date: 28 June 1998 18:21
>
> On Sun, 28 Jun 1998, Mariette Marleau wrote:
>
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Tzeentch <tzeentch666_at_...>
> > To: space-marine_at_... <space-marine@...>
> > Date: Sunday, June 28, 1998 12:45 PM
> > Subject: [Epic] Assumptions on the next edition
> >
> >
> > >Hard to see the reasoning for female figures in this line.
> > >Demographicallythe game is male dominated. Unless they are just
trying to
> > >appeal to younger males sex drive. That's probably it.
> > ><shrug> Got to love GW marketing
> > >
> > Maybe it took this long for females to break the gender barrier and
make the
> > rank of Commisar?
>
> Well, in all the confusion of these related posts...it seems this new set
is
> more for other then Epic40K as the model looks well to detailed for an
Epic
> 40K scale miniture. We are talking about Epic 40K units are we not?
>
> - The Scaled-down Shadow Slinks!!
>
>
Received on Sun Jun 28 1998 - 21:02:31 UTC