RE: [Epic] Chaos Land Raiders

From: J. Michael Looney <mlooney_at_...>
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 1998 09:54:26 -0500

At 10:13 AM 7/10/98 -0400, you wrote:
>IMHO what is unbalancing with AT is the ability to pick the tgt - with no
>restriction like have to pick the closest "vehicle" target. Also the
>abiliity to kill a five man (or 3 bike/boar) stand with one shot is a little
>extreme. In 40k best a lascanon can do is kill one model. If the rules
>stated it could ignore only stands with more than one model on it then it
>could not snipe at cdrs and ork speedstas for example. Likewise if an AT
>shot at a say 3 bike stand it should only have a 1 in 3 chance to kill all
>

Are we going to go back to my fav-o-rite rant?

GW's targeting rules and why I think they suck and why power gamers think
they rule?

Lets not forget that one Epic turn is 4 turns of WH40K, so one "shot" by a
land raider is 4+ shots in WH40K.

--
Geek code: GAT -d---(----) H+ s:-- g+(?) p0? au a w+++ v-(++)*?
C++++$ U?++++ P+ L 3 N+++ K W+++ m-- v-- -po+ Y+ t++ 5 j R+++
G' !tv(--) b+++ D++ B--- e+ u--(+)(**) h f+(?) r+++ n++ y+++(**)
http://www.ionet.net/~mlooney/index.shtml
Received on Fri Jul 10 1998 - 14:54:26 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 13:10:44 UTC