Re: [Epic] Where to go? What to do?

From: Brett Hollindale <agro_at_...>
Date: Mon, 3 Mar 1997 07:31:43 GMT

At 08:30 PM 2/3/97 +0200, you wrote:
>On Sun, 2 Mar 1997, Simon Dodds wrote:
>> Now, I don't know how to set up a mailing list or anything like that, the
>> only thing I can think of is multiple emails, thus keeping it separate from
>> the mailing list and only those interested in the netEPIC project. Aside
>> from that I cannot think of any other ways to keep discussion running. Maybe
>> if there is only a few of us left who want to continue this work a multiple
>> email can be set up. Just LET US/ME/WHOEVER KNOW!!!
>
> As it is uncertain how many people are really interested in Net Epic
> and how many people want it removed from the list, why don't we hold
> a vote about it? I already proposed this to Peter. Votes could be
> publicly to the list or maybe to a few different people, who collect
> the votes.
> If the majority wants to keep net epic on the list, there should be
> no reason for any more complaints from the other side. But if the
> majority want it off, "a multiple mailing list" - or whatever, could
> be created while net epic is looking for a mailinglist of it's own.
>
> So how about it? Let's be democratic. :)
>
> - Jason

Fine by me.

I vote we can it.
(That's Ausi slang for "remove it from the list")

It isn't EPIC anymore - it is something wholly different and therefore quite
inappropriate to this forum.

IF we were just "tweeking" the EPIC rules to remove the couple of dozen
glaring inconsistancies (eg Doomweavers vs Voidshields) then I would say "go
for it".

As we are designing a whole new game more or less from the ground up, I
suggest that it be done somewhere else...

Agro
Received on Mon Mar 03 1997 - 07:31:43 UTC