Re: [Epic] Epic 40K Orders

From: Brett Hollindale <agro_at_...>
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 1997 13:33:40 GMT

At 11:56 AM 6/3/97 -0800, Howard wrote:
>>The reason Net Epic was asked to move off the list was because of the
>>volume of
>>mail generated by contributors to the product. Once the product is finished,
>>it will almost certainly be welcome on the list again, providing that the
>>amount
>>of mail generated because of it isn't overly large.
>
>Well, I recall Agro pointing out that NetEpic would have been okay if the
>list had only been tweaking the rules, but now it's a whole new game, and
>should be moved off. And there were at least two "I agrees." Epic40K is
>much more drastic a makeover, and no one is seriously suggesting that it be
>moved off. Based on the manner in which the move was proposed, I think it
>fair to say that NetEpic was driven off the Epic list.


Hey - I get enough flac over things I DID do! I hope you aren't blaming me
for that...

I went through my mail box and found this:

quote

> As it is uncertain how many people are really interested in Net Epic
> and how many people want it removed from the list, why don't we hold
> a vote about it? I already proposed this to Peter. Votes could be
> publicly to the list or maybe to a few different people, who collect
> the votes.
> If the majority wants to keep net epic on the list, there should be
> no reason for any more complaints from the other side. But if the
> majority want it off, "a multiple mailing list" - or whatever, could
> be created while net epic is looking for a mailinglist of it's own.
>
> So how about it? Let's be democratic. :)
>
> - Jason

Fine by me.

I vote we can it.
(That's Ausi slang for "remove it from the list")

unquote


Actually I'm only setting the record straight because I'm a pedantic bastard...

Agro
Received on Fri Mar 07 1997 - 13:33:40 UTC