Re: [Epic] Titans and CC (a new theory...) LONG

From: Brett Hollindale <agro_at_...>
Date: Sat, 8 Mar 1997 00:02:41 GMT

At 01:07 PM 7/3/97 +0100, you wrote:
>Brett Hollindale wrote:
>
>>
>> (Does anyone know for sure whether doomweavers ignore void shields? How
>> many FAQ's do you have on file Allen? And how many unanswered? If GW wrote
>> their rules WELL, there wouldn't be any FAQ's would there?)
>
>AAAAAAAAARRRRRRRGGGGGHHHHHHHHH!!!! not again please not again!!!!
>excuse me Brett, but this remind me a bloody debate that messed the list
>some time ago :)
>please don't repeat that shame!!!!


Sorry Lorenzo, I don't want to open the debate again (I may be stupid, but
I'm not THAT stupid!) I was just using the best example I could think of to
demonstrate that the GW rules are not at all well written. That specific
and the hundreds of FAQ's are a pretty convincing argument IM(H?)O...

I concur with the sentiment of NOT opening that can of worms again.

Agro



>
>--
>Lorenzo Canapicchi
> mailto:canapicc_at_... (Univerity)
> mailto:lcanapic_at_... (home)
> http://www.cli.di.unipi.it/~canapicc
>Epic Eldar Page
> http://www.gol.grosseto.it/istanze/tabletoys/epic/engepic.htm
>Game Page (Mostly in Italian)
> http://www.gol.grosseto.it/istanze/tabletoys/mdt.htm
>Talk canapicc_at_...
>--
>Geek code:GCS d++ H s g? p25 au--- a- w++ v+++ C+++ UO+++ P+ L++++ 3
>E--- N+++ K--- WM- V-- -po+ Y-- t+ !5 !j R+ G'''' tv+ b+++ D- B? e+
>u** h* f++ r+ n+++ !y+ ..... :>
>--------------------------------------------------------------------
>Written on 100% recycled electrons
>
>
>
Received on Sat Mar 08 1997 - 00:02:41 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 13:09:13 UTC