Re: [Epic] Another contentious issue

From: Brett Hollindale <agro_at_...>
Date: Mon, 10 Mar 1997 06:46:28 GMT

At 09:12 AM 10/3/97 +1000, you wrote:
>>Last night I blew the leg off an enemy titan and my oponent pointed out that
>>it was entirely possible that the titan was not, in fact, destroyed as we
>>had always supposed. Here's his reasoning...
>>
>>Titan leg damage (6) states: "The leg is blown apart and the titan
>>collapses to the ground. Decide which way the titan falls and place it on
>>its side lying in that direction. Any vehicles or troop stands fallen on
>>are destroyed."
>>
>>It doesn't actually state that the titan is destroyed.
>>
>>We (my gaming crowd) have always assumed that the titan is destroyed when it
>>falls because that is what happens in the description of the power ram.
>
>O.K. I've had this trouble before and even had someone claim he could shoot
>at me Even though the Titan had fallen over. We solved this issue. I
>believe that in the Leg Damage table under result 4 (or its equivalent) that
>it states that the Titan has suffered extensive damage to the leg and that
>it will snap if put under too much stress. That damage result states that
>if the leg snaps, determine which way the Titan falls and it is considered
>destroyed if it does fall. This is a LOWER result than the "Titan Falls"
>result and so I assume that it applies to the more serious result too.
>
>I am FAIRLY sure of this, but I don't have my rules on me so I could be wrong.
>
>-Kelvin.....
>


Yep, that's an accurate quote and answers the question beyond any doubt I
would say.

Thanks

Agro
Received on Mon Mar 10 1997 - 06:46:28 UTC