Re: [Epic] Another contentious issue

From: Brett Hollindale <agro_at_...>
Date: Thu, 13 Mar 1997 12:00:52 GMT

At 08:58 AM 12/3/97 -0600, you wrote:
>At 09:23 PM 3/11/97 +0000, you wrote:
>
>>I would tend to say that titans/gargants were not hit at all. The titan
>>damage chart states that "troops and vehicles" are destroyed. It doesn't
>>mention "titans/gargants". As I recall, there is a FAQ about titans falling
>>on buildings which suggests that the building should take a save at -5, but
>>this would be an addendum to the rules and not part of them.
>>
>>
>>Agro
>
>I think it should count as a hit inside the shields. I don't know about
>that -5 save mod, but that might be okay if you roll to scatter twice (sort
>of a death throes/kamikaze lunge attack).
>
>Temp
>
>

Um, Temp, that's the building takes a save at -5 NOT the titan...

Agro
Received on Thu Mar 13 1997 - 12:00:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 13:09:14 UTC