Re: [Epic] epic 40k detachment costs

From: Spatula <shupes_at_...>
Date: Fri, 11 Apr 1997 15:40:48 -0400

> From: tbloom_at_... (Thomas Bloom)
>
> >You're absolutely right, it is a bit daft to have forgotten to include
> >the +25 into the CSM and SM captain costs. I suppose the way the SM
> >list is written allows you to have a detachment lead by a captain (with
> >or without a librarian), or by a librarian, or by an ordinary stand.
> > The Eldar Harlequins list makes it strangely expensive to field both a
> >Great Harlequin and a Shadow Seer in the same detachment (as I believe
> >the +25 has been added to both units' costs).
>
> It might be that they want to let folks to field multiple SM captains in a
> Detachment (like in the 2nd ed. companies) but want to discorage multiples
> of some of the other command units. Just a guess though.

        That would be a nice thought (that GW actually tried to make
our old armies compatible in such a manner), except that the 2ed SM
companies' HQ was only 1 stand - it was the IG armies that had 2 stands
in their HQs. Unless I misunderstood your meaning.

Scott
shupes_at_...
Received on Fri Apr 11 1997 - 19:40:48 UTC