On Mon, 21 Apr 1997, Mark A Shieh wrote:
> Paul Tobia <heresy_at_...> writes:
> > Although the Knights might not be as
> > powerful as you remeber from 2nd. ed. (Hi Mark :) I think my prelim.
> > points values reflect that.
>
> Hi! However, I consider the opinion of several people on the
> list to be more valuable than my own one opinion, and I am clearly in
> the minority.
It was just a little insider joke to the people who've been monitoring our
discussion, I hope no offense was taken. :)
>
> > Unit Move Range FP AV Armor Notes Pts.
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > Paladin 25cm 45cm 3 6 6+ 35
>
> I think a 2FP is more appropriate, if you're still interested
> in a faithful conversion. They're identical to Falcons as far as
> their guns go.
You must be an Eldar player... I'm an Imperial player and thePaladin
battlecannon was better than a Leman Russ battlecannon in TL, that's why I
picked 3FP. Also in E40k the Leman Russ costs 32 points, making the
Paladin a steal at 35.
> > Heavy 20cm 60cm MC 3 6+ 50
>
> I would definitely be happier if it had a save and cost 5-10
> more. The Baron has it, after all.
How about a Save and +5 points?
> Sounds like it's almost done. Can we get Allen to submit this
> to the Primarchs after a playtest?
Yeah sounds like a good idea... I might get in a game or two this weekend.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Paul R. Tobia _O_
"Never underestimate the bandwidth of a station wagon |
full of tapes hurtling down the highway." (Tanenbaum,1996)
ptobia_at_...
http://falcon.cc.ukans.edu/~heresy
Received on Tue Apr 22 1997 - 04:00:12 UTC