Re: [Epic] Re: No Subject

From: Thomas Lee Denney <seether_at_...>
Date: Thu, 29 May 1997 09:21:11 -0500

>OK, OK, I know I shouldn't try to think logically about any GW rules.
>That's my first mistake. But, you've gotta admit, the idea of an
>Imperator Titan with 4 DC being as light as a Shadowsword just kinda
>sticks going down. And I wasn't debating the relative effectiveness
>of the SLD vs other weapons, just weather damage reduced mass. This is

I would agree with your earlier statement that damage does rearrange mass,
BOTOH I'd say it also makes an object lighter in that chunks are blown
clear off too.

>probably another area where GW will vacillate between rulings, or not
>provide one at all. I would like to see this question submitted to Jervis
>for a ruling, hopefully with the accompanying examples.
>
>--Ken Taborek oberon_at_...
>"Show respect for age. Drink good Scotch for a change."- random fortune
>
>
>On Wed, 28 May 1997, David Lado wrote:
>[chomp]
>> But I agree with Lemm; it's even more ridiculous to argue the physics
>> of invisible traktor beams :).
>>
>> David

I'll drink to that (please don't let this start another "Beer and Epic40K"
thread).

Ravenwing Speeder Motto: Dark Angels don't die, we just go back to the
rock and regroup!

seether_at_...
Ezekiel- Grand Master of Librarians
Received on Thu May 29 1997 - 14:21:11 UTC