Re: [Epic] Q&A 3 and NEWS!
At 08:40 PM 6/17/97 -0400, you wrote:
>Given the vageries that make it into the rulebook, I think it's very unwise
>to over-interprit a Q&A which Jervis may not have even proofread before
>sending out (though his spelling is suspiciously good :).
Gee, I think that a group of folks are spending time to coordinate sending
this stuff at THEIR request, and they could return the courtesy by spending
hte time to give a clear answer.
>I think it's
>very unlikely that rampagers only roll dice when they win. It's more
>likely Jervis just sent out the answer without thinking about how a
>bunch of nit-pickers (who, us? ;) would interprit it.
And that's why GW rules systems continue to be second-rate.
Temp
Received on Wed Jun 18 1997 - 13:29:29 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0
: Tue Oct 22 2019 - 13:09:34 UTC