Re: [Epic] Tactic Critique

From: Stephen Sheldon <stephes_at_...>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 1997 12:45:20 -0700 (PDT)

>
> Eugene E.W. wrote:
>
> > I did not mean to imply that it was unclear whether disrupt weapons use the
> > superheavy weapon chart for blast markers; I'm just not totally sure
> > whether, if a single disrupt weapon succeeds in it's roll, one blast marker
> > or two blast markers are placed (one from the weapon, and possibly one for
> > scoring a hit as according to the SHW blast marker table).
>
> There was either a remark by AC on this, or it's in the E40K books.
>
> Basically, a disrupt weapon that successfully disrupts is a 'hit' for
> the purposes of BMs.
>
> Thus, if a single Disruptor fires, you get either 2 BMs or none. If 2
> fire, you can get 0, 2 or 3. If 3 fire, you can get 0, 2,3 or 4. And if
> 4 fire, you automatically get 1 (4 SHWs firing) plus up to 4 others.

For fairness we always played that 1 disrupt caused 0 or 1 BMs.
Steve
Received on Fri Jul 25 1997 - 19:45:20 UTC