Hi!
I also feel vehicle mounted bolter should be better and the stats you
suggest should be the ones used.
Peter
-----Original Message-----
From: Weasel Fierce [mailto:septimus__at_...]
Sent: Saturday, March 30, 2002 11:59 AM
To: netepic_at_yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [NetEpic ML] Brainstorm session
>
>3. Another thorn is the issue of weapons with the same name having
>different stats for different units (bolters being the most prominent
>example). A lascannon should have the same stats regardless where its
on as
>well as battle cannons, etc. Some uniformity here makes it easier for
>people to remember
This would be nice, but consider a real life example. The Browning .50
cal
machinegun is a heavy tripod weapon capable of shredding a light
armoured
vehicle at close range. The FN minimi are a light squad support weapon
for
use purely against infantry. Both of these are machine guns however.
One thing I would like though was for Tank bolters to be upgraded.
Likely to
25 cm range or a 5+ to hit roll. On virtually every tank except the
rhino,
each bolter is in fact a heavy bolter and ought to be more powerfull
than an
assault stand firing pistols, or at least as effective
_________________________________________________________________
Chat with friends online, try MSN Messenger:
http://messenger.msn.com
To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
Received on Fri Mar 30 2001 - 22:00:18 UTC