[NetEpic ML] Re: Eldar wrapup?

From: AntiChrist <seimejote_at_...>
Date: Tue, 12 Aug 2003 06:44:12 -0000

--- In netepic_at_yahoogroups.com, Zerloon <zerloon_at_i...> wrote:
> Hi to all!!!!
>
> Comments belowe
>
> At 17.59 10/08/2003 +0000, you wrote:
> >A couple of things:
> >
> >- Eldar Super-Heavies should have Holofields (smaller than those of
> >Titans: 3+ on Charge, 4+ on Advance and 5+ on First Fire) and lose
> >the possibility to make pop-up attacks. Maybe armour should be
> >lowered to 2+.
>
> No pop-up but always skimmer right?

+AC+ Yes

> >- Eldar Flyers should have only 5+ all-around armour (actually they
> >are the TOUGHEST flyers, very uncharacterful) and gain Holofields
too
> >(smaller than Super-Heavies: 4+ on Charge, 5+ on Advance and 6+ on
> >First Fire).
>
> I can live with this, but I shouldn't make a mess with too
different
> holofields.
> We can give the SH the same holofield as Titan (they not charge,
IMHO!)

+AC+ They are too small to house the Titans' Holofield generators
(their wings). A smaller version is more adequate IMO.

> Also per flyer they are much faster than titans, I thinks we can
leave the
> armour save (sigh!!) but give them an holofield+manouvrability 4+
save.

+AC+ Holofield saves depend on the speed and evasive manoeuvres of
the flyer, so why not differentiate them upon orders like all other
holofields?
Received on Tue Aug 12 2003 - 06:44:12 UTC