[NetEpic ML] Some thing about V5

From: Archi Magister F�ag�l <mangonneau_at_...>
Date: Wed, 26 May 2004 02:47:40 +0200

        Hi !

        I start to make some remarks.


        ELDARS :

        Farseer would be better on a vyper. In 40k,
   eldar characters are on a platform (in place of
   shuriken canon). So, he would be only armed with
   a single shuriken catapult.

        I think Striking Scorpions and Howling
   Banshee are too mighty in close combat. +6 is
   too much. +3 would be more rigth. With a
   laspistol (25 cm, 5+).
        Theses Eldar Aspects are not better
   than imperial assault SM. Theirs special
   rules are more than enough.


        CHAOS :

        I don't understand why a Khorne army
   may include Slaanesh... but not Tzeench !
   Why a Tzeench army may include Nurgle...
   but not Khorne !
        Why a Nurglee army may include Tzeench...
   but not Slaanesh. Why a Slaanesh army may include
   Khorne... but not Nurgle.

        Normaly, Khorne is opposed to Slaanesh
   and Tzeench to Nurgle.
        Not Khorne against Tzeench and not
   Slaanesh against Nurgle.


        IMPERIAL SPACE MARINES

        I don't understand why the more polyvalent
   troops are allways dressed with theirs rhinos !
        It's a real handicap in full of grounds
   like jungle, ruined city, mountain...
        It's allways an handicap for assault marines.
   Assault marines are equiped with jetpack to advance
   unimpeded. But rhinos are like a chain-and-ball
   punishment ! :o(
        In SM2/TL, I created/calculated SM without
   rhinos support cards and company cards. It's better.

        I think that SM would be able to have
   better fire skill. Like 4+.



        GENERAL

        In SM2/TL, I concede a +1 bonus against
   infantery for all anti-personnel weapon like
   bolter, storm bolter & co... To give infantery
   back the like, I add a modifier to fire against
   it equal to TSM.




              Archi Magister Feagul

"ANHAK DRAKKHEN AGHNAHIR HURTHD !!!!!"
.




To unsubscribe send e-mail to: netepic-unsubscribe_at_egroups.com
Yahoo! Groups Links
Received on Wed May 26 2004 - 00:47:40 UTC