Re: [NetEpic ML] Slann, the proof is in the math

From: Teras Cassidy <greywolf_at_...>
Date: Thu, 27 Apr 2000 10:36:58 -0600

>> I can agree with all your suggestions that differed from mine. By the way
>> those comments that you state "look at X unit" you are suggesting to use
the
>> points of that comparable unit? If so I agree, comparable units should
cost
>> the same.
>
>I don't agrre here, units must be judged not only for stats and cost but
>also keeping in mind in wich context they live i.e. depending on the
>army overall characteristics, playtest it's the best way to see an army
>pro & cons and if it is or not unbalanced, 'couse give you an overall
>consideration.
>My suggestion is keep your changes and test it, after the test you can
>trim values.

I would have to agree with Lorenzo here. Keep Peter's suggestions and play
test them. We can then change them again to get a better balancnce. IMHO
all other suggestions can be discussed when the data comes in (games are
played).

Teras
Received on Thu Apr 27 2000 - 16:36:58 UTC