Re: [Epic] New to list . . . want some opinions.

From: Scott Shupe <shupes_at_...>
Date: Tue, 09 Dec 1997 12:51:00 -0500

Thane Morgan wrote:
>
> Scott Shupe wrote:
> > SM does not favor taking a defensive posture. Losing
> > initiative means that you are completely unable to respond to your
> > opponent's CC moves. It also means you can't CC skimmers, which
> > hurts when you're playing a CC army against Eldar.
>
> This is incorrect. You use advanced fire to protect your close combat
> troops. You move those troops who can't find covering fire away from the
> enemy where they can't be charged.

        It's hard to be out of charge range when you're defending
objectives that are in the middle of the board. When you're
defending anything, really, considering the speed and proliferation
of bike (or similarly fast CC) units. There is no counter measure,
you just have to try and pin his stuff before it gets to you, or
to present juicy targets that you don't mind sacrificing and then
hope your opponent goes for them.

        Also, advance fire occurs after the fact - many times your
opponent will have no problems losing his assault troops to advance
fire as long as he gets to wipe out your arty/tanks/titans in the CC
phase. And there's still the skimmer problem.

Scott Shupe
shupes_at_... shupes@... http://www.rpi.edu/~shupes
***********************************************************************
"Who's laughing now?" - Evil Dead II
Received on Tue Dec 09 1997 - 17:51:00 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 13:10:06 UTC