Re: [Epic] EPIC40k Rumor (Control)

From: <oki_at_...>
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 1997 14:16:48 +0800

At 09:16 PM 2/6/97 -0600, you wrote:
>
>"This is Rumor Control and these are the facts."
>
>(SNIP)

>Close Combat:
>
>CC not only represents hand-to-hand fighting, but also short range firing
>_in_a_supporting_role_. As Jervis has said losers in CC will lose ground,
>automatically breaking off combat (probably to be charged again next
>turn.) Also see my comments on bases and psykers for more on CC.
>

The losers will break, but not die ? Obviously I am missing something, but
not quite sure what it is. Could you clarify it to me more.

>Any more rumors? Feel free to ask, Rumor Control is here. No fear too
>great, no concern too small.
>
>

Thanks for the offer. Really appreciate it.

A few questions:
1. From what you know, do you think of the new system. Is it
significantly better, in your opinion, of course...

2. I understand that there are 3 books (?), one of which listed "all"
the units available for Epic40K. How comprehensive is it ? Does it have Ork
Flyers, Eldar Exodites, Titans ? If it does not, I think GW will most
probably come out with supplements (Codex Epic Eldar, Codex Epic Chaos, blah
:P) and probably another set for Titans (Waaarrrrggghhhh!!!)

3. Do the rules clarify some classic "doom-weavers vs void shields",
blah, blah, blah issue ?

4. Is it worth the money ? SQ, probably. Me, I will probably be buying
it anyway :(


Regards
Oki
Received on Wed Feb 12 1997 - 06:16:48 UTC