RE: [Epic] scenarios

From: Miller, Chris <CMiller_at_...>
Date: Fri, 25 Jul 1997 11:23:35 -0500

><< You wrote :
> >Does anyone have any E40k scenarios they'd be willing to share with
> >me? We're
> >just getting into e40k here and would like some that aren't of the
> >stock
> >variety.....
> >
>
> Sorry I havn't got any good ones but I'm very interested in this
> topic.
>
> How do you create a well balanced scenario for Epic? I'm fed up with
> only "xxxx points vs xxxx points" battles (I think it's the same problem
> I have with backgrounds, I like to know why I'm fighting even
> for little battles...).
>
>
> Francois Bruntz
> Apprenti MIAGE (Universite Paris XII - IBM France)
>
>I am working on converting some WWII scenarios, some scenarios from Panzer
>Blitz, and other board games to see if they will work. I'm not sure how to
>make point comversions though so I thought if anyone else has done this they
>could help.

----> My thoughts also - I have some favorite ASL scenarios I'm going
to use as a starting point, and see what happens.

One question: What do list members prefer? Forces for each side
defined down to the unit (which you may not have) or broader, "x
points of IG tanks, x points of IG infantry" type guidelines? I think
a broad approach with a few speciifc units to keep the right flavor
is best, but what do people want?
        I'm just concerned that we might have a great scenario
that calls for 3 great gargants. I'm pretty into my orks, but I
don't have 3 great gargants (megas, yes, greats, no) so the
scenario would be difficult for me to use - not impossible
(ok, I've got the cut-out, my great, and my ork dreadnought
from 40K - or just use the 3 megas as greats) but less than ideal.

I'll be mulling this one over some more...

Chris Miller
Received on Fri Jul 25 1997 - 16:23:35 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Oct 22 2019 - 13:09:40 UTC